Qualified Content was like what?

Qualified Content was like what? - The question that always comes up at every going to write an article, quality may be interpreted as providing benefits , have appropriate accuracy, focus on the core (red line) and the issues raised are not long-winded . Equipped with arguments ( reasons ) that logically acceptable to readers , that's the simple version of the content that I think could be considered qualified.

But as we all know, an information in the form of text, audio or video that is part of a website / blog search engines need help in order to get to the prospective reader (human).

And now how can we know (assess) quality content version of google or other search engines? Search engine algorithms will perform a filter on all the sites will be given a position in SERP in accordance with the quality that is in the article.



Two equally important factors, human and search engine algorithms need each other in giving judgment on a piece of content. I think personally, first build a quality content that is intended for the reader, with the increasing number of visits to a site, and BR ( bounce rate) are increasingly ramping up the search engine algorithms will start providing a decent position on the site.

In making an article can be considered the On Page will be the reference search engine algorithms pass judgment on the content. Such as the selection of article titles, using keywords (keywords ) that are relevant, density ( keyword density ) as well as the placement of each paragraph.

Well that's my brief article this afternoon that try to give a little opinion (personal) on how to create quality content that could lift the popularity of a website in the eyes of the readers and which will have a positive effect on the position of a website in search engines SERP.